Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management.
Reed, M. S.
Stringer, L. C.
Evely, A. C.
MetadataShow full item record
REED, M.S., STRINGER, L.C., FAZEY, I., EVELY, A.C. and KRUIJSEN, J.H.J. 2014. Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management [online], 146, pages 337-345. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021
This paper outlines five principles for effective practice of knowledge exchange, which when applied, have the potential to significantly enhance the impact of environmental management research, policy and practice. The paper is based on an empirical analysis of interviews with 32 researchers and stakeholders across 13 environmental management research projects, each of which included elements of knowledge co-creation and sharing in their design. The projects focused on a range of upland and catchment management issues across the UK, and included Research Council, Government and NGO funded projects. Preliminary findings were discussed with knowledge exchange professionals and academic experts to ensure the emerging principles were as broadly applicable as possible across multiple disciplines. The principles suggest that: knowledge exchange needs to be designed into research; the needs of likely research users and other stakeholders should be systematically represented in the research where possible; and long-term relationships must be built on trust and two-way dialogue between researchers and stakeholders in order to ensure effective co-generation of new knowledge. We found that the delivery of tangible benefits early on in the research process helps to ensure continued motivation and engagement of likely research users. Knowledge exchange is a flexible process that must be monitored, reflected on and continuously refined, and where possible, steps should be taken to ensure a legacy of ongoing knowledge exchange beyond initial research funding. The principles have been used to inform the design of knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement guidelines for two international research programmes. They are able to assist researchers, decision-makers and other stakeholders working in contrasting environmental management settings to work together to co-produce new knowledge, and more effectively share and apply existing knowledge to manage environmental change.
Permalink for this recordhttp://hdl.handle.net/10059/1699
Collections in which this item appears
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Boswell, Robin; Craw, Susan (Elsevier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(99)00018-0, 1999-10)BOSWELL, R. and CRAW, S., 1999. Knowledge modelling for a generic refinement framework. Knowledge Based Systems, 12 (5-6), pp. 317-325Refinement tools assist with debugging the knowledge-based system (KBS), thus easing the well-known knowledge acquisition bottleneck, and the more recently recognised maintenance overhead. The existing refinement tools ...
El Harbi, Sana; Anderson, Alistair R.; Amamou, Meriam (Emerald Group Publishing Limited http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242531111100559, 2011)EL HARBI, S., ANDERSON, A. R., AMAMOU, M., 2011. Knowledge sharing processes in Tunisian small ICT firms. Library Review, 60(1), pp. 24-36.Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how knowledge and information is shared by small information and communication technology firms in Tunisia. Design/methodology/approach – The paper employs a comparative ...
Tobin, Ndibarafinia Young (Robert Gordon University The Scott Sutherland School of Architecture and Build Environment, 2017-10-25)TOBIN, N.Y. 2017. A framework for knowledge capture and recovery in whole life costing practice. Robert Gordon University, PhD thesis.In spite of the benefits of implementing whole life costing technique as a valuable approach for comparing alternative building designs allowing operational cost benefits to be evaluated against any initial cost increases ...