Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeron, Michael James
dc.contributor.authorBelford, Pauline Helen
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-24T13:10:16Z
dc.date.available2016-11-24T13:10:16Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-01en
dc.identifier.citationHERON, M.J. and BELFORD, P. 2015. Musings on misconduct: a practitioner reflection on the ethical investigation of plagiarism within programming modules. ACM SIGCAS computers and society [online], 45(3), pages 438-444. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874304en
dc.identifier.issn0095-2737en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10059/1981
dc.description.abstractTools for algorithmically detecting plagiarism have become very popular, but none of these tools offers an effective and reliable way to identify plagiarism within academic software development. As a result, the identification of plagiarism within programming submissions remains an issue of academic judgment. The number of submissions that come in to a large programming class can frustrate the ability to fully investigate each submission for conformance with academic norms of attribution. It is necessary for academics to investigate misconduct, but time and logistical considerations likely make it difficult, if not impossible, to ensure full coverage of all solutions. In such cases, a subset of submissions may be analyzed, and these are often the submissions that have most readily come to mind as containing suspect elements. In this paper, the authors discuss some of the issues with regards to identifying plagiarism within programming modules, and the ethical issues that these raise. The paper concludes with some personal reflections on how best to deal with the complexities so as to ensure fairer treatment for students and fairer coverage of submissions.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherACMen
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPlagiarismen
dc.subjectProgrammingen
dc.subjectTeachingen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectMoralityen
dc.subjectAttributionen
dc.subjectAcademic Misconducten
dc.subjectEducationen
dc.titleMusings on misconduct: a practitioner reflection on the ethical investigation of plagiarism within programming modules.en
dc.typeJournal articlesen
dc.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874304en
dcterms.publicationdate2016-01-05en
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.dateDeposit2016-11-24en
refterms.dateFCA2016-11-24en
refterms.dateFCD2016-11-24en
refterms.dateFreeToDownload2016-11-24en
refterms.dateFreeToRead2016-11-24en
refterms.dateToSearch2016-11-24en
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.panelBen
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2015-09-01en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
rioxxterms.versionAMen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0