Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Anne
dc.contributor.authorCoessens, Kathleen
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-22T10:32:06Z
dc.date.available2016-12-22T10:32:06Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-31
dc.identifier.citationDOUGLAS, A. and COESSENS, K. 2017. Improvisation as experimentation in everyday life and beyond. In Coessens, K. (ed) Experimental encounters in music and beyond. Leuven: Leuven University Press [online], pages 159-176. Available from: http://upers.kuleuven.be/en/book/9789462701106en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10059/2057
dc.description.abstractIn this chapter we analyse two interrelated projects across the fields of visual art and music, philosophy and anthropology. Calendar Variations (2010–11) is a visual activity initiated by Anne Douglas, visual artist and researcher. A Day in My Life (2011–12) mirrors this activity in music and is developed by Kathleen Coessens, pianist and philosopher. The two projects are research driven and frame questions about the relationship of improvisation to experiential knowledge. First, what might experimentation be in the context of experience of life and experience of art? Does improvisation as a concept and a practice offer new potential to inform experimentation in a distinctive way? We will use Dewey as a starting point for a phenomenological approach to experience as a form of ongoing experimentation and adjustment, a process of learning endemic to life itself. We will map this articulation onto Hallam and Ingold’s four characteristics of improvisation. These closely resonate with Dewey while nuancing/inflecting the resulting learning as an experience between people, formed socially and culturally. Moving deeper into experience, experiment, and improvisation as three key interrelated concepts, we look briefly at Bergson, who offers a way of imagining experience as time dependent: life is constantly in a process of formation that is unstoppable even in reflection. This implies a conflation of intuition and intellect into one single activity, leaving the artist-as-researcher in a paradoxical situation. How is knowledge created if we cannot look back on experience by stepping outside what is ongoing? Arnheim helps us to unravel this paradox: intellect and intuition are distinctive but interrelated modes of being. We limit ourselves in life, Arnheim argues, to what is useful and necessary to know, working within this contingent. Art enriches possible ways of imagining. These challenge and extend experience. We lay out this theoretical ground as the basis from which to analyse the two artistic projects. By interpolating between the theoretical and artistic experiences, we enlarge not only our perspectives on but also our actions in the world.en
dc.description.sponsorshipAHRC, the Barn, Sound festival of contemporary music, Orpheus Institute of Research into Musicen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherLeuven University Pressen
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0en
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectVisual artisten
dc.subjectMusicen
dc.subjectPhilosophyen
dc.subjectAnthropologyen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectImprovisationen
dc.titleImprovisation as experimentation in everyday life and beyond.en
dc.typeBook chaptersen
dc.publisher.urihttp://upers.kuleuven.be/en/book/9789462701106en
dcterms.publicationdate2017-12-31en
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2017-12-31en
rioxxterms.typeBook chapteren
rioxxterms.versionAMen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0