OpenAIR @ RGU >
Theses (Management) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||The institutional effects of the Scottish Parliament upon organised interests.|
|Authors: ||MacIver, Hazel E. C.|
|Supervisors: ||Black, Stewart|
|Issue Date: ||Jun-2004|
|Publisher: ||The Robert Gordon University|
|Abstract: ||Interest group activity in Scotland has been subject to relatively little academic research.
This thesis, begun the same year that the Scottish Parliament opened, looks at the effects of
this new political institution (with particular emphasis on the legislature) upon the behaviour
and beliefs of six interest groups in Scotland. The effect of the different parliamentary
components (the Scottish Parliament as a whole, the Scottish Executive, the committees, the
committee clerks and MSPs) on the groups is looked at in detail.
Two of the groups chose not to adopt insider strategies, believing that the parliamentary
committees were the best venue for their organisations to target. During the early years of
the Scottish Parliament the six groups regarded the legislature (namely the committees) as a
target to change policy and not just as a channel to the Scottish Executive.
New institutionalist theory was applicable in explaining the responses of the groups, although
one of the three approaches - rational choice, sociological and historical institutionalism – is
more applicable than the other two in certain circumstances. Sociological institutionalism is
the most applicable new institutionalist approach in explaining behaviour during the bringing
about of change; historical institutionalism is most applicable when change is being
established as new institutions and rules are set up and rational choice institutionalism is the
most applicable approach during times of stability, allowing groups to look to their own self
interests. It is possible to predict which approach is most applicable at any one time,
depending on the circumstances and whether the group works in isolation or if it interacts
with others in the political system.|
|Appears in Collections:||Theses (Management)|
All items in OpenAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.