OpenAIR @ RGU >
Business >
Law >
Journal articles (Law) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 27 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Christie JCL2009.pdf93.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The relevance of harm as the criterion for the punishment of impossible attempts.
Authors: Christie, Sarah
Keywords: Criminal liability
Harm as a criterion
Impossible attempts
Imminent harm
Future harm
Issue Date: Apr-2009
Publisher: Vathek.
Citation: CHRISTIE, S., 2009. The relevance of harm as the criterion for the punishment of impossible attempts. Journal of Criminal Law 73(2), pp. 153-161.
Abstract: There has been much debate about the relevance of punishment in cases of impossible attempts. This article sets out the current position in Anglo-American jurisdictions and considers the rationale behind punishment in hypothetical impossible attempt cases in order to draw out the key issues at the heart of responsibility. The cases of the inadequately prepared attempt and the attempt which is doomed to failure are compared to illustrate the relevance of the potential to cause harm in the justification for punishing such actors. The article concludes with the suggestion that the relevant criterion is the presence of the potential to cause imminent harm, as opposed to future, speculative harm.
ISSN: 0022-0183
Appears in Collections:Journal articles (Law)

All items in OpenAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


   Disclaimer | Freedom of Information | Privacy Statement |Copyright ©2012 Robert Gordon University, Garthdee House, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, AB10 7QB, Scotland, UK: a Scottish charity, registration No. SC013781