OpenAIR OpenAIR
 
 

OpenAIR @ RGU >
Design and Technology >
Architecture & Built Environment >
Theses (Architecture & Built Environment) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10059/575
This item has been viewed 77 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Andrew Whyte PhD.pdf31.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Building design team communication: practice and education.
Authors: Whyte, Andrew
Supervisors: Pollock, Robert
Andrew, C. A.
Wilson, A.
Donald, J.
Baxter, Seaton
Issue Date: Sep-1996
Publisher: The Robert Gordon University
Abstract: This study examined three propositions: - (i) there are problems in the building design team created by difficulties of communication between different professional disciplines, (ii) communication difficulties are primarily a function of cultural differences instilled by vocational education, and (iii) communication gaps require educational initiatives able to bridge cultural differences instilled by vocational traditions in the educational process. To achieve the most efficient process and ultimately a more effective product, building design team professionals must maximise their capacity for integrated activity and inter-professional communication. The nature of inter-professional relationships, and their development through the group formation process, is presented as a central consideration in the analysis of building design team communication. The rationale and methodological development of the study seeks to understand whether differences in inter-professional interaction are largely a matter of values and attitudes, and whether these can be modified by training to improve communication in the building design team. Research examines whether influencing positively professional attitudes at the formative stage addresses inter-disciplinary dissonance. This study establishes a link between education for the construction industry, and the adverse affects of perceived professional discord. This study goes beyond current conflictual opinion regarding the structure of specialised education for construction, and presents evidence that, handled correctly, future tertiary education can provide the most suitable antecedent for a more efficiently integrated building industry.
Appears in Collections:Theses (Architecture & Built Environment)

All items in OpenAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

 

 
   Disclaimer | Freedom of Information | Privacy Statement |Copyright ©2012 Robert Gordon University, Schoolhill, Aberdeen, AB10 1FR, Scotland, UK: a Scottish charity, registration No. SCO13781