OpenAIR @ RGU >
Health and Social Care >
Pharmacy & Life Sciences >
Theses (Pharmacy & Life Sciences) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||An investigation of the structures and processes of pharmacist prescribing in Great Britain: a mixed methods approach.|
|Authors: ||Dapar, Maxwell Patrick|
|Supervisors: ||Stewart, Derek C.|
|Issue Date: ||Jan-2012|
|Publisher: ||Robert Gordon University|
|Abstract: ||The aim of this research was to investigate the structures and processes of
pharmacist prescribing in Great Britain, focusing on primary care settings. A
‘sequential-mixed methods’ was employed in the conduct of the research.
The first phase was a cross-sectional postal questionnaire of all pharmacist
prescribers (n= 1654 in January 2009), to quantify the extent and nature of
prescribing and key factors associated with prescribing practice.
Response rate was 42.3% (n=695). The pharmacy practice setting was
significantly associated with prescribing (those in hospital or general medical
practice were more likely to have prescribed (p< 0.05), than respondents in
community practice). Factor analysis of attitudinal statements on prescribing
implementation revealed factors, grouped as: ‘administrative structures and
processes’, ‘perceptions of pharmacists’ prescribing role’ and ‘facilities for
prescribing’. Scores for ‘facilities for prescribing’ varied depending on practice
setting. Respondents in community practice recorded lower median scores
compared with those in general medical practices. However, there were no
statistically significant differences in median scores between respondents based
in GP and hospital settings.
In-depth qualitative work undertaken in the second phase further explored
facilitators of, and challenges to prescribing practice (e.g. the lack of defined
prescribing roles) identified in phase one. Semi-structured interviews were
conducted with a purposive sample of 34 prescribers. Prescribers were selected
from diverse settings, including secondary care from England and Scotland, to
highlight key factors contributing to prescribing success which could potentially
inform extrapolations of successful practice from one setting to the other.
The ‘framework’ approach to qualitative data analysis was rigorously applied,
revealing that the professional isolation and issues around access to clinical
data and administrative support in the community setting may have negatively
impacted on prescribing implementation. Notably, a perceived lack of clarity and
definition of the pharmacist prescribing role was a key theme in hindering
prescribing practice of pharmacists irrespective of setting. Participants described ‘ideal’ roles which they perceived as potentially providing clarity,
definition and direction to facilitate implementation.
The original data generated through this research highlights that prescribing
implementation is less than desired, especially in community pharmacies.
Pharmacist prescribing appears to have progressed little since supplementary
prescribing developments in 2004, even with the much heralded arrival of
independent prescribing in 2006. Interestingly, phase 2 participants suggested a
‘hybrid supplementary/independent’ prescribing model, as more likely to
succeed. In this model, pharmacist prescribers favour a cooperative practice
arrangement in which doctors diagnose and pharmacists prescribe. The
implication of these findings and specific recommendations for policy makers,
other key stakeholders and practitioners are discussed in detail within the
|Appears in Collections:||Theses (Pharmacy & Life Sciences)|
All items in OpenAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.