OpenAIR OpenAIR
 
 

OpenAIR @ RGU >
Health and Social Care >
Centre for Obesity Research and Epidemiology >
Journal articles (Centre for Obesity Research and Epidemiology) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10059/785
This item has been viewed 12 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Broom Family Practice 2008 engaging patients.pdf950.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Engaging patients, clinicians and health funders in weight management: the Counterweight Programme.
Authors: Counterweight Project Team
McQuigg, Maria
Brown, Jennifer E.
Broom, Iain
Laws, Rachel A.
Reckless, John P. D.
Noble, Paula A.
Kumar, Sudhesh
McCombie, E. Louise
Lean, Mike E. J.
Lyons, G. Felicity
Mongia, Sarika
Frost, Gary S.
Quinn, Marney F.
Barth, Julian H.
Haynes, Sarah M.
Finer, Nick
Haslam, David W.
Ross, Hazel M.
Hole, David J.
Radziwonik, Steven
Keywords: Patient-professional engagement
Obesity management
Issue Date: Dec-2008
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Citation: THE COUNTERWEIGHT PROJECT TEAM: MCQUIGG, M., BROWN, J. E., BROOM, J. I., LAWS, R. A., RECKLESS, J. P. D., NOBLE, P. A., KUMAR, S., MCCOMBIE, E. L., LEAN, M. E. J., LYONS, G. F., MONGIA, S., FROST, G. S., QUINN, M. F., BARTH, J. H., HAYNES, S. M., FINER, N., HASLAM, D. W., ROSS, H. M., HOLE, D. J., and RADZIWONIK, S., 3008. Engaging patients, clinicians and health funders in weight management: the Counterweight Programme. Family Practice, 25 (S1), pp. i79-i86.
Abstract: Background. The Counterweight Programme provides an evidence based and effective approach for weight management in routine primary care. Uptake of the programme has been variable for practices and patients. Aim. To explore key barriers and facilitators of practice and patient engagement in the Counterweight Programme and to describe key strategies used to address barriers in the wider implementation of this weight management programme in UK primary care. Methods. All seven weight management advisers participated in a focus group. In-depth interviews were conducted with purposeful samples of GPs (n = 7) and practice nurses (n = 15) from 11 practices out of the 65 participating in the programme. A total of 37 patients participated through a mixture of in-depth interviews (n = 18) and three focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were analysed for key themes that emerged. Results. Engagement of practice staff was influenced by clinicians’ beliefs and attitudes, factors relating to the way the programme was initiated and implemented, the programme content and organizational/contextual factors. Patient engagement was influenced by practice endorsement of the programme, clear understanding of programme goals, structured proactive follow-up and perception of positive outcomes. Conclusions. Having a clear understanding of programme goals and expectations, enhancing self-efficacy in weight management and providing proactive follow-up is important for engaging both practices and patients. The widespread integration of weight management programmes into routine primary care is likely to require supportive public policy.
ISSN: 0263-2136
1460-2229
Appears in Collections:Journal articles (Centre for Obesity Research and Epidemiology)

All items in OpenAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

 

 
   Disclaimer | Freedom of Information | Privacy Statement |Copyright ©2012 Robert Gordon University, Schoolhill, Aberdeen, AB10 1FR, Scotland, UK: a Scottish charity, registration No. SCO13781