OpenAIR @ RGU >
Health and Social Care >
Centre for Obesity Research and Epidemiology >
Journal articles (Centre for Obesity Research and Epidemiology) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: an open-pilot intervention study in secondary care.|
|Authors: ||Dombrowski, Stephan U.|
Sniehotta, Falko F.
Brown, Jennifer E.
Soares, Vera A.
|Keywords: ||Behavior change|
Behavior change techniques
|Issue Date: ||Apr-2012|
|Citation: ||DOMBROWSKI, S. U., SNIEHOTTA, F. F., JOHNSTON, M., BROOM, I., KULKARNI, U., BROWN, J., MURRAY, L., SOARES, V. A., 2012. Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: an open-pilot intervention study in secondary care. Patient Education and Counseling, 87 (1), pp. 108-119.|
To test and optimize the feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity (PA) and healthy eating behavior change intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities.
Open-pilot intervention study using an uncontrolled pre and post design with ongoing measures on intervention acceptability and feasibility. Participants received 5 weekly nurse-led one-hour long group sessions. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed throughout. PA, dietary behavior and weight were measured before and after the intervention.
Of 74 consenting participants, 61 (82%) received and 47 (64%) completed the intervention. Average ratings of intervention materials and components by participants ranged between 4.1 and 4.9 out of 5. Average facilitator satisfaction rating was 90% (range 75–100%). The intervention delivery was feasible as indicated by ratings and comments from participants and the facilitator. Participants lost −0.86kg of weight t(45)=3.84, p=0.0001, and increased PA by an additional 1.6 (SD=2.7) sessions/week, t(31)=−3.3, p=0.002. No significant dietary differences emerged.
The intervention was acceptable to the facilitator and participants and feasible for delivery. Several intervention aspects were further optimized.
The current study outlines a PA and dietary behavior change pilot intervention coupled with a systematic and transparent process of intervention optimization.|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles (Centre for Obesity Research and Epidemiology)|
All items in OpenAIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.